RAW Ring – Infidelity Ring: Would you wear a smart ring that tracks your partner's emotions?

RAW Ring, a conceptual smart ring from RAW, is said to help build trust in relationships by analyzing biometric data partners – in real time. While on paper it sounds like a tool for deeper understanding and greater emotional connection, skeptics warn: It may be more about digitalized jealousy than technologically supported loyalty.

Love, the 21st century is calling – and it wants your heartbeat

Imagine this scene: your partner is going out for a “beer with Mike” night, but you notice your smart ring is flashing a strange, vibrant pink. No, it’s not a sign of bad beer. It’s that your partner’s heart rate is suspiciously high. And so is their temperature. Maybe it’s just a heated argument… or is Mike just a catchy name?

In reality, the RAW Ring promises more than just heart rate monitoring. We're talking about a device that measures your voice, tone, movement, and body temperature, then feeds all that magic to an AI that spits out: "Distress detected. Location: living room. Partner: not you." Ugh.

A technological Tinder for paranoid romantics

RAW, the company known for its no-filter dating app of the same name (literally – users are required to send raw, unfiltered selfies), clearly believes that honesty is still cool. But now they're taking it a step further – it's not about showing up without a filter. Now you have to be without secrets. Emotionally.

The RAW Ring is designed as a kind of digital conspiracy symbol: you trust me, and I'll let you see my hormones. On paper, it sounds touching. In practice? More like an episode of "Black Mirror: Parter Tracker Edition."

A device that knows more about your emotions than you do

RAW Ring is said to use “dual-level AI” – meaning one AI works locally (on the device), while the other one thinks somewhere in the cloud whether your stress might really be due to your socks being too short. It’s the perfect cocktail of biometric analysis, where AI can distinguish between exercise, arousal and – say – panic before a visit from your mother-in-law.

But the question remains: Do we really want devices to understand more about our bodies and our well-being than we do? And worse – to share this data with our partner? The science may be ready, but are couples who already don't trust their partner with a PIN-free phone ready for this?

Trust: built-in or forced?

RAW says it's a symbol of fidelity. But it was also that gold ring that we've been wearing at weddings for 2,000 years—and look how many of them end up on Facebook as "engaged" these days. The idea that a digital ring will suddenly solve human insecurities is about as realistic as voice analysis distinguishing between crying over a sad movie and despair over running out of Nutella.

And yes, the developers are aware of the dangers. They promise customization: you can turn off what data you share with your partner. You can stop it all. You can even take the ring off. But if trust is conditioned by an app, LEDs, and “emotional A/B testing,” then perhaps the problem isn’t the technology, but the relationships themselves.

Conclusion: A ring he'll never forget – but you might want to

RAW Ring may never really hit the market. It may remain in the labs of startup visionaries and dreamers with ideas about Love 2.0. But the idea is here – and the questions it raises are important. Where is the line between emotional intimacy and digital snooping? When does surveillance become covert manipulation?

And – let’s be honest – do we really want a device analyzing our every breath, every drop of sweat, and every tone in our voice? Is this love? Or is it just a technological version of the old question: “Did you really suspect me?”

Bonus tip: If your partner starts suggesting “wearing a RAW ring together,” it might be time for an honest conversation. No AI.